Cheating And Bribery In The Olympic Games
| by Nigel Spivey
▼Members
▼Tags ▼LibraryThing Recommendations ▼Member recommendations None Sign up for LibraryThing to find out whether you'll like this book. No current Talk conversations about this book. ▼Published reviews ▼Common Knowledge
References to this work on external resources. Wikipedia in English (3)The word 'athletics' is derived from the Greek verb 'to struggle or to suffer for a prize.' As Nigel Spivey reveals in this engaging account of the Olympics in ancient Greece, 'suffer' is putting it mildly. Indeed, the Olympics were not so much a graceful display of Greek beauty as a war fought by other means. Nigel Spivey paints a portrait of the Greek Olympics as they really were--fierce contests between bitter rivals, in which victors won kudos and rewards, and losers faced scorn and even assault. Victory was almost worth dying for, the author notes, and a number of athletes did just that. Many more resorted to cheating and bribery. Contested always bitterly and often bloodily, the ancient Olympics were not an idealistic celebration of unity, but a clash of military powers in an arena not far removed from the battlefield. The author explores what the events were, the rules for competitors, training and diet, the pervasiveness of cheating and bribery, the prizes on offer, the exclusion of 'barbarians,' and protocols on pederasty. He also peels back the mythology surrounding the games today and investigates where our current conception of the Olympics has come from and how the Greek notions of beauty and competitiveness have influenced our modern culture. No library descriptions found. /top-girl-game-cheats.html. ▼LibraryThing members' description
|
Audible(0 editions) Project Gutenberg(0 editions) Swap(3 want) Popular coversRatingAverage:
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The Ancient History of Cheating in the Olympics Punishment for cheating and bribery in the Olympics of Ancient Greece could include fines, public flogging and statewide bans from competition. The ancient Olympics were finally abolished as being un-Christian in 393 AD. The competitions themselves were also subject to cheating, bribery and what we would now call doping.
The Rio Olympics have also been marred by allegations of doping and bribery. Before the Games even began, 118 Russian athletes were banned from competing after allegations of a state-sponsored doping regime. A weightlifter from Kyrgyzstan was stripped of a bronze medal and a number of other athletes were sent home because of doping allegations. Aug 19, 2016 Cheating, bribery and scandal, it seems, were part of the Games right from the start – as were attempts to prevent them. They are not a sign of the decline of the Olympic idea in the modern era, but part of human nature. Ancient Greek athletes sometimes resorted to cheating, bribing competitors and potions to secure victory at the Olympic Games, a far cry from the image of the classical sporting ideal, an expert said. Several recent Olympics have been rocked by bribery scandals, most famously the 2002 Salt Lake Games, with members taking payola from potential host nations in order to sway voting according to the New York Times. And with many voters having lifetime membership, there are pretty much no effective checks or balances to prevent further corruption.
Jason Tremblay – PFT CertificateSince sport was created over two thousand years ago, so too has cheating. Competitors and coaches have always been searching for loopholes in the IOC ruling system, creating performance enhancing drugs, and using tactics to provide the upper hand in competition. While this competitiveness and drive to win has created implements that are contrary to the values of fair play in sport; competitiveness is also the reason why we have sport science. Athletes have become on drugs to reach the highest levels. Cheating and sport science have been intertwined ever since the origin of sport in Ancient Greece.
Cheating in the Ancient Olympic Games
Cheating And Bribery In The Olympic Games 2019
In the first set of Olympic Games there were no rules forbidding performance enhancement aids. There is evidence of performance suppression tactics such as bribery and curses. On one such occasion legend has it that curses were placed on competitors so that they would not be at their best, or that the God’s of the Underworld would drive them mad. This involved the burial of a lead tablet containing the curse in racing venues. Another method of cheating, which was typical in the ancient world and still common today, is bribery. In the ancient world hidden payments were made for athletes to purposely suppress their performance and lose the event. In one famous case, a man who had previously promised his son’s opponent money, refused to pay the opponent. Unfortunately the man had said this in public, where everyone could hear him. Responses to cheating in the Ancient Olympic Games involved the removal of any titles that the cheater had earned, as well as the erection of a monument recording the cheaters achievements for all time.
Pre-PED Testing Era
During the early 20th century athletes began to discover the power behind ergogenic aids and performance enhancing drugs. Long distance athletes began taking performance aids before and even during races. One such example occurred in the 1904 Olympic Games where Thomas Hicks consumed strychnine and brandy before and during the race. Until the Olympic games of 1968, the use of PEDs was simply a part of sport. There was no testing forbidding it and as a result sport science programs allocated financial assets to the development of ergogenic aids and PEDs. With the benefit of hindsight, we can now begin to see why certain nations such as Belarus, East Germany and the USSR were so successful in international competition. The benefits of PEDs can be seen in the diagram of annual training loads of the Bulgarian National Weightlifting Team seen below.
Introduction of Drug Testing
After the 1962 Olympics the IOC had seen enough of the effects that performance enhancing drugs were having on the games. The integrity of the Olympics was being challenged by the scientists making PEDs, coaches administering PEDs and the athletes taking them. In 1968 the IOC began drug testing at the first ever Olympic games. Although drug testing systems were put in place, the testing was not vigilant enough to detect many of the drugs that athletes were taking. In the 1968 Olympic Games only Hans-Gunnar Liljenwall, a Swedish Pentathlete, had tested positive for the use of alcohol. As drug testing protocols became more and more intensive, the number of athletes who tested positive in the 1972 Games and 1976 Games began to rise drastically.
The Ben Johnson Scandal
The 1984 Los Angeles Olympics sparked one of the greatest sprinting rivalries of all time between Canadian sprinter Ben Johnson and American sprinter Carl Lewis. The American sprinter would eventually go on to win Gold in the 100 meter. After the 1984 games, the lead up to the 1988 Summer Olympics belonged to the Canadian Ben Johnson. Johnson confirmed his status as the number one sprinter in the world by beating Lewis and smashing the world record at a time of 9.83 seconds at the World Championships of 1987. In the Seoul 100 meter dash Ben Johnson clocked an incredible time of 9.79 seconds and beating his rival Carl Lewis to win gold. The success of Johnson was short; Ben Johnson was only king of the sprinting world for 3 days before drug testing results showed that he had tested positive for Stanzolol. Johnson’s main defense for cheating was that other competitors were cheating as well and that he was just trying to maintain pace with his competitors. This was a claim that gathered weight with the release of the Exum Report, which accused Carl Lewis of taking performance enhancing drugs. The Ben Johnson scandal is widely considered to be the biggest doping scandal in the history of the Olympics.
References