Cheating Game Game Theory
Cheating on a Game Theory Exam
UCLA Professor Peter Nonacs teaches a Behavioral Economics class and he allowed his students to cheat on his Game Theory Exam. According to Professor Nonacs, he told his class “the Game Theory exam would be insanely hard.” And he also stated that because the exam will be so hard he would allow them to cheat. He told them they “could bring and use anything or anyone they liked, including animal behavior experts. They could surf the Web. They could talk to each other or call friends who’d taken the course before. They could offer me bribes.” After he made the announcement he noticed how his class changed. They started to live out game theory discussing what the payoff matrix was and what kinds of strategies would be best. He noticed that a group of students, who normally did not even speak to each other, came together to focus on one single task. Download game my talking angela cheat. In the end the students were able to work together in an organized manner and received a high grade for the exam.
This course is an introduction to game theory and strategic thinking. Ideas such as dominance, backward induction, Nash equilibrium, evolutionary stability, commitment, credibility, asymmetric information, adverse selection, and signaling are discussed and applied to games played in class and to examples drawn from economics, politics, the movies, and elsewhere. With a cheating strategy so that selfish individuals are at an advantage when they are rare, but disadvantaged when they are common. Game theory is a useful approach for mathematically predicting which strategy, if any, will dominate such a contest. Social scientists use game theory to predict which behaviors will spread through a population. Game theory of cheating firms. This is the currently selected item. Game theory worked example from AP Microeconomics. Practice: Oligopoly and game theory.
This is an explicit example of the topic of Game Theory. Students are normally accustomed to a strategy of studying hard in order to compete with fellow classmates, but through this experience the students learned to choose the best strategy for themselves and the group. The students also were able to comb through the different possible strategies when they were having discussions about whether they should work in one large group or work in smaller subgroups, and even in the discussions about the people who didn’t study and were planning to parasitize everyone else’s hard work. The discussions were about which strategies would lead them to the greatest payoff, which in this case was the grade that they received. Going through strategies and the different payoffs the students essentially lived out game theory rather than simply learning about it.
the students were able to work together in an organized manner and received a high grade for the exam.
LINK:WHY I LET MY STUDENTS CHEAT ON THEIR GAME THEORY EXAM
Comments
Leave a Reply
Blogging Calendar
| M | T | W | T | F | S | S |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 |
The brainy cephalopods have ruled many oceans for millions of years. With their highly advanced eyes and coloured 'skins,' they are well able to transmit and receive signals more complex than most. Shape and colour change make them one of the leading camouflage experts of the animal world. East of Australia the mourning cuttlefish (Sepia plangon) is a competent hunting and courtship expert!
Culum Brown, Martin P. Garwood and Jane E. Williamson of Macquarie University in Sydney published their cephalopod study this week in the journal Biology Letters on a remarkable 'cheating' technique.
After six years in Sydney Harbour, they deserve to be read. Honesty is always the best policy, except when you can cheat. Even children can discover this in the simplest of gaming theory approaches to their communication with others. A cheat should be punished and in this case, they are, if they are found out!
A small number of cheats can always manipulate the system, despite strong retributions. With the adept cephalopod systems, a rapid switch from honest to dishonest and back again is easily achieved. The research found that an unbelievable 38% of males used dual signals when only one rival male was present. The authors' prediction of rife deception in the cuttlefish world was fulfilled. They should try banking. The display is easily manipulated; simple for this animal to change and difficult for distant males to determine.
The rival male approaches from the right at 'A'. The male (M) quickly adopts the brown diamond and white pattern on his right side, while maintaining the male courtship appearance on his left. The female (F) is happy, the male passes his spermatophore over for mating (using tentacles) and the rival thinks he's choosing which lady to 'party' with; Credit: © Culum Brown/Biology Letters
What is the retribution then? If a rival discovers the female signal is wrong, a fight breaks out. Dominant males tend to win, so punishment could involve injury to a somewhat delicate body. The time needed to persuade a female to mate is increased by means of this tactic. Culam and the others suggest it's like the surreptitious mating of gorillas when the silverback male isn't looking, and they are dead on! Those precious few seconds allow the important transfer to take place.
How linked is this behaviour to the type of performance we find in primates and others? Cognition in these cephalopods is as advanced as their sensory systems. Complex social group soften employ this kind of advanced 'detection' (and deception).
In the short-lived cuttlefish, perhaps we have a glimpse of life in the depths with more long-lived relatives. The suggestion this research makes is that the social complexity of cephalopods could approach that of primates, if this is what they are capable of.
Follow:Twitter / Facebook / Google+ / Pinterest / MoreNature News
Topics: Fish